网赚论坛

 找回密码
 免费注册
查看: 218|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

加文说,我不同意core对BIP的实施计划

[复制链接]

19

主题

19

帖子

76

积分

Ⅰ级财主

Rank: 1

积分
76
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-11-20 23:08:24 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
gavinandresenGavin Andresen - Bitcoin Dev 118 points 3 days ago
SOV == Store of Value.
I disagree with cypherdoc: I think a money that evolves is a great store of value, as long as the evolution is done carefully so that people storing value are unaffected.
I disagree with the order in which Core is rolling out these BIPs -- they're prioritizing features that will make implementing the lightning network easier.
Ideally, something like CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY/CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY would be part of a Script redesign. Every time you see a new VERIFY opcode, it is technical debt-- it would be technically cleaner and more powerful if there were generic PUSH_TRANSACTION_INFO and PUSH_BLOCK_INFO opcodes and CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (and all sorts of other powerful stuff) was built out of those more generic concepts.
Reasonable people can disagree about whether it is worth having CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY now, as a feature that will have to be supported forever (assuming it activates). It is not a HUGE amount of code, and it enables more than just Lightning, so getting it sooner rather than tackling a complete Script rewrite is probably the right thing to do.
But fixing transaction confirmation reliability (aka INCREASE THE FRICKING BLOCK SIZE LIMIT ALREADY) should be a much higher priority.

如果看不懂上面这句话,看看我的帖子就知道了:
bitbet倒闭,可能是由于国内大矿池合谋
http://8btc.com/thread-32049-1-1.html

(出处: 巴比特论坛)
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

广告合作|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|财富吧

GMT+8, 2026-7-18 18:44 , Processed in 0.343201 second(s), 35 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.1

© 2014-2021 财富吧

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表