|
|
昨日受翻译过的YFFE的帖子《只要回复classic或者core》的启发,西方论坛也有币友发起了一个Classic vs. Core的投票。
根据发起者的叙述(原帖),发起者将此投票发在了Reddit的/r/btc, /r/Bitcoin, /r/Bitcoin_uncensored, /r/Bitcoin_Classic等四个子版块。
其中/r/Bitcoin的投票贴遭到删除,并导致发起者在该子版块被禁言。
![]()
投票结果如下:
![]()
发起人还节选了一些投票双方的留言:
Classic方留言:
- Decentralize governance.
- Classic brings the future.
- Because Classic is in favor of a blocksize increase and Classic will remove Replace-by-Fee.
- Gavin FTW!
- BLOCKSTREAM SUCKS!
- Classic to follow up satoshi vision. Fuck Core Scoundrels !
- Bitcoin classic is the future! As some one who works in the banking world, I can tell you the core roadmap looks familiar. Switch to classic to keep BTC, open and free for everyone!
- Classic > Blockstream Privatized Developement
- Classic leadership actually engages the Bitcoin community. Core acts like Bitcoin is their basement side project and fears outside influence.Classic is clearly the best solution!
Core方留言:
- will switch to Classic later
- The debate is overblown.
- Most miners don't pay attention to bitcoin politics so a lot wouldn't switch causing 2 blockchains making BTC worthless.
- I go for core. Classic are for people who can not code and try to get out of developers dependency with some config tuning change.
- no real capacity constraint todayclassic team is not real competition
|
|